Google staged four discussions expounding on the finer points of 
its "Glass" wearable computer during this week's developer conference. 
Missing from the agenda, however, was a session on etiquette when using 
the recording-capable gadget, which some attendees faithfully wore 
everywhere - including to the crowded bathrooms. 
Google
 Glass, a cross between a mobile computer and eyeglasses that can both 
record video and surf the Internet, is now available to a select few but
 is already among the year's most buzz-worthy new gadgets. The device 
has geeks all aflutter but is unnerving everyone from lawmakers to 
casino operators worried about the potential for hitherto unimagined 
privacy and policy violations. 
"I had a friend
 and we're sitting at dinner and about 30 minutes into it she said, 'You
 know those things freak me out,'" said Allen Firstenberg, a technology 
consultant at the Google developers conference. He has been wearing 
Glass for about a week but offered to take them off for the comfort of 
his dinner companion. 
On another occasion, Firstenberg admitted to walking into a bathroom wearing his Glass without realizing it. 
"Most of the day I totally forget it's there," he said. 
Many
 believe wearable computers represent the next big shift in technology, 
just as smartphones evolved from personal computers. Apple and Samsung 
are said to be working on other forms of wearable technology. 
The
 test version of Glass looks like a clear pair of eyeglasses with a 
hefty slab along the right side. Since it began shipping to a couple 
thousand carefully selected early adopters who paid about $1,500 for the
 device, it has inspired a bit of ridicule - from a parody on "Saturday 
Night Live" to a popular blog poking fun at its users. 
Other
 industry experts take a more serious tack, pointing out the potential 
for misuse because Glass can record video far less conspicuously than a 
handheld device. 
Glass also has won many fans.
 Google and some early users maintain that privacy fears are overblown. 
As with traditional video cameras, a tiny light blinks on to let people 
know when it is recording. 
Several Glass 
wearers at the developers conference said they whip the device off in 
inappropriate situations, such as in gym locker rooms or work meetings. 
Michael Evans, a Web developer from Washington, D.C., attending the 
Google conference, said he removed his Glass when he went to the movies,
 even though the device would be ill-suited for recording a 
feature-length film. 
"I just figured I don't want to be the first guy kicked out of the movies," he said. 
No Glass allowed
A
 stamp-sized electronic screen mounted on the left side of a pair of 
eyeglass frames, Glass can record video, access email, provide 
turn-by-turn driving directions and retrieve info from the Web by 
connecting wirelessly to a user's cell phone. 
Google
 Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt dismissed concerns about the brave new 
world of wearable computers during a talk at Harvard University's 
Kennedy School of Government in April. 
"Criticisms
 are inevitably from people who are afraid of change or who have not 
figured out that there will be an adaptation of society to it," he 
said. 
Schmidt acknowledged that there are 
certain places where Glass will not be appropriate but that he believed 
new rules of social etiquette will coalesce over time. Firstenberg said 
it will take time for all sides to get comfortable with the new 
technology. 
"I don't think we should go into the conversation assuming that Glass is bad," he said. 
Indeed,
 previous technology innovations such as mobile phones and wireless 
headsets that initially raised concerns are now subject to tacit rules 
of etiquette, such as not talking loudly on the bus and turning a ringer
 off in a meeting. 
Still, some have decided to leave nothing to chance. 
Casino
 operator Caesar's Entertainment recently announced that Glass is not 
permitted while gambling or when in showrooms, though guests can wear it
 in other areas. In March, Seattle's Five Point Cafe made headlines for 
becoming the first bar to ban Glass. "Respect our customers privacy as 
we'd expect them to respect yours," says a statement on the cafe's 
website. 
The California Highway Patrol says 
there is no law that explicitly forbids a driver from wearing Glass 
while driving in the state. But according to Officer Elon Steers, if a 
driver appears to be distracted as a result of the device, an officer 
can take enforcement action. 
Privacy track record
Lawmakers are beginning to consider Glass. 
On
 Thursday, eight members of the US Congress sent a letter to Google 
Chief Executive Larry Page, asking for details about how Glass handles 
various privacy issues, including whether it is capable of facial 
recognition. 
According to Google, there are no
 facial recognition technologies built into the device and it has no 
plans to do so "unless we have strong privacy protections in place." 
During
 one of this week's conference sessions - an open discussion about Glass
 - members of the Glass team answered a question about privacy by noting
 that social implications and etiquette have been a big area of focus 
during the development of the product, which is still a test version. 
Some
 of the Glass-phobia may stem from Google's own track record on privacy.
 In 2010, Google revealed that its fleet of Street View cars, which 
criss-cross the globe taking panoramic photos for the Google Maps 
product, also had captured personal information such as emails and web 
pages that were transmitted over unencrypted home wireless networks. 
"The
 fact that it's Google offering the service, as opposed to say 
Brookstone, raises privacy issues," said Marc Rotenberg, the executive 
director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit 
privacy advocacy group, citing Google's history and its scale in 
Internet advertising. 
Rotenberg says his main 
concern centers on the stream of data collected by the devices - 
everything from audio and video to a user's location data - going to 
Google's data centers. 
Ryan Calo, a University
 of Washington law professor who specializes in privacy and technology, 
said Glass is not very different from other technologies available 
today, whether it is a smartphone or "spy" pens that secretly record 
audio. But Glass is on people's faces, so it feels different. 
"The
 face is a really intimate place and to have a piece of technology on it
 is unsettling," Calo said. "Much as a drone is unsettling because we 
have some ideas of war." 
For all the hand-wringing, some early adopters are sold. 
Ryan
 Warner, who recently graduated from college and who has developed a 
recipe app for Glass with Evans, said he was surprised by the reaction 
he got when he went to a bar. 
"I was like, 'I 
don't know if I should have it on or not.' I was kind of in that phase,"
 he said, "and the bouncer was like, 'Oh, my god, is that Google Glass?'
 He was excited."

